Skip to content

Music news, business and culture.

Join Newsletter

Universal and Sony Sue Canada’s Musi Over Unlicensed Streaming

Universal Music and Sony Music have filed a joint copyright infringement lawsuit in Canada against Musi, a streaming app that operates without direct licensing agreements.

Universal Music and Sony Music logos next to the Musi app icon, representing the copyright lawsuit filed against the streaming app.

Universal Music and Sony Music have filed a joint copyright infringement lawsuit in Canada against Musi, a music streaming app that distributes songs without direct licensing agreements with rightsholders. The action targets what the recorded music industry calls “parasitic apps” that build commercial services around unlicensed music streams.

Musi’s Business Model and App Store Removal#

Musi does not hold licensing deals with record labels or music publishers. The app sources its catalogue from YouTube and layers its own advertising and subscription offerings over the content. Apple removed Musi from the Apple App Store in September 2024 after a complaint from YouTube, but the app remains functional on devices that downloaded it before the removal.

Musi sued Apple over the removal. That case ended with a ruling in Apple’s favour, as the App Store terms of service allow Apple to remove apps “at any time, with or without cause.”

Industry Calls Musi a ‘Parasitic’ Service#

Victoria Oakley, CEO of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), described the lawsuit as a warning to similar services. “We are serving notice on parasitic apps, which are designed specifically to exploit artists and their music, and undermine legitimate music services,” Oakley said. “They have no place in today’s music ecosystem which is built on the premise of empowering innovation through licensing.”

Musi has previously argued that its model is lawful because YouTube already licenses the music and pays rightsholders, and the app claims to comply with YouTube’s terms of service. YouTube’s earlier complaint to Apple suggests the platform disputes that compliance.

The lawsuit was filed in Canada, where Musi Inc is based. The case will centre on copyright law rather than YouTube’s terms of service, as YouTube is not a party to the litigation.

IFPI and its Canadian affiliate Music Canada allege that Musi is:

  • “making copyright-protected sound recordings available to the public without authorisation”
  • “deliberately circumventing the technical protections put in place by YouTube in order to steal content from the service”

Sponsored

ToneGrid: deliver your music globally. White-label distribution, royalties and analytics for labels and distributors.

More like this

Pick your tempo

Who owns what, who got paid, and who is about to. The business behind African music, told like it is actually interesting (because it is).

  • The deals and catalogue sales nobody put out a press release for
  • Chart moves and streaming numbers we actually fact-checked (wild, we know)
  • Fresh names added to the directory, vetted before you ever see them

Free forever Ghost us anytime, one click

Get the inside track from Afrobeats Wire

Choose your speed. We will handle the rest.

How fast do you want it?

Your inbox is sacred. This address is used for the newsletter and nothing else, never sold, never passed on. Privacy policy.